Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: result, the seizure's only immediate con sequence for Good was that his tenants were required to pay their monthly rent to the U.E. Marshal, to be held ir es- CrOW pending the outcomo the forfeiture proceed- ings That temporary 1083 of the use J money perdente hte does not render the proodures used this case constitutionally inadequate This Court has repeatedly held that claimant has no due pror ess right to prescizure notice and an opportunity for hearing. even when the forfeiture proccedings sulted in the temy porary loss of the use of the prop- erty (incl luding money). See Calero-Toledo Pear- son Yacht Leasing Co. 416 U.S 663. 679 (1974} United States $8850, 555 562 (1983) United States Von Neumann, 474 U.S. 242 249 I. (1986). ability of the U.S. Marshal to manage the: property : and { ...
(.png)
